![]() Paper is correctly cited.ĥ-6 pts: Fair writing, with a few mistakes. Alternatively, the argument and analysis may be good, but do not respond to the assignment prompt.Īddressing all assignment questions: 4 ptsħ pts: Paper is well-written and free of grammar and spelling errors. Critical thinking is insufficient.Ġ-11 pts: There’s hardly an argument, or it is difficult to follow. It may be contradictory or rely heavily on unsupported assumptions. The argument is not convincing.ġ2-14 pts: Argument engages poorly with course concepts or assignment questions. The argument and analysis respond directly to the assignment prompt.ġ5-17 pts: Argument is thoughtful and has some evidence to support it, but it may have gaps or it may rely on unsupported assumptions. 5 points given for trying to engage with 1 or more concepts.ġ8-20 pts: Argument is very well-formed with evidence from modules or other sources to support it. Shows understanding of half of the concepts addressed.Ġ-8 pts: Understands less than half of the concepts addressed. ![]() ![]() ![]() Shows understanding of roughly 2/3 to 3/4 of the concepts addressed.ĩ-10 pts: Addresses at least 2 concepts. Engaging concepts includes defining them and explaining how they help understand the theme of the paper.ġ1-13 pts: Addresses at least 3 concepts. 14-15 pts: Shows full grasp of course content by correctly engaging 3 or more course concepts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |